Awesome, via Fabulon

Now, I completely understand why the comment leaving queens of Fabulon are a leetle more disappointed with this image than I am. It’s lacking in the homo part, definitely.  I concede this point.

However, I consider it off-the-charts hot. For various reasons. Physically, this dude is redolent of the hairless dark haired boy thing who treated me to naked zen time this weekend (yum) but that’s just a part of it. I guess it’s this - how often is a bisexual referred or labeled at all in smutty sexy stuff of the ages?

How often do bisexuals engaged in opposite sex activity (I guess you could pretend that’s no gender girl and it’s hot on other levels, too) get “outed” labeled as such - or depicted? If a guy is fucking a woman of course the assumption is that he’s straight and nothing untoward, queerness wise, could possibly be happening - I LOVE the way the text fucks that up here. It’s downright PoMo textbook in image against text.

But also - there’s this old school randy butch “I just fuck everything” flavor of bisexuality that’s lacking lately in the literature - I guess it’s what people call “straight acting” or “straight and I love men sucking my dick” and I call “bullshit, you are bisexual as a Jean Genet homo, bi as me and the day is long, Closet Clyde.”

And quite frankly, I find the ones who don’t care, agree, and ID as bi, and love to fuck, and are avid and hungry, and nasty tops (better yet, self-professed mostly-tops who crumble at my touch), to be quite attractive. The only kind of Mantop that lights my kindling is one for whom be sucked and periodically suck, (why not?) is all good.

Uh, and that cover is camp fabulous. But that’s without saying.